Interruptions to a Bracha - Revision history

Unknown user: /* When is a new Bracha Rishona required? */

2023-01-31T06:02:13Z

When is a new Bracha Rishona required?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 31 January 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	#If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>		#If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>
	#If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vikru, Rosh Pesachim 10:24, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7 establish that davening isn't a hefsek to a meal. Kaf Hachaim 178:38 and Piskei Teshuvot 178:20 apply this to a snack just like a bread meal. The Taz 178:10 has an entirely different approach that rejects the Tosfot and Rosh and follows the opinion of Rabbenu Yom Tov that davening is a hefsek unless one left some of one's group at the first place.</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>		#If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vikru, Rosh Pesachim 10:24, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7 establish that davening isn't a hefsek to a meal. Kaf Hachaim 178:38 and Piskei Teshuvot 178:20 apply this to a snack just like a bread meal. The Taz 178:10 has an entirely different approach that rejects the Tosfot and Rosh and follows the opinion of Rabbenu Yom Tov that davening is a hefsek unless one left some of one's group at the first place.</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>
	# Eating one of the seven species of Israel is like bread, and therefore one who leaves the location and returns does not repeat the beracha. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 178 </ref>		# Eating one of the seven species of Israel is like bread, and therefore one who leaves the location and returns does not repeat the beracha. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 178:10 </ref>

	==Interruption of a Bread Meal==		==Interruption of a Bread Meal==

Unknown user at 07:05, 30 January 2023

2023-01-30T07:05:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 30 January 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	#If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>		#If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>
	#If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vikru, Rosh Pesachim 10:24, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7 establish that davening isn't a hefsek to a meal. Kaf Hachaim 178:38 and Piskei Teshuvot 178:20 apply this to a snack just like a bread meal. The Taz 178:10 has an entirely different approach that rejects the Tosfot and Rosh and follows the opinion of Rabbenu Yom Tov that davening is a hefsek unless one left some of one's group at the first place.</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>		#If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vikru, Rosh Pesachim 10:24, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7 establish that davening isn't a hefsek to a meal. Kaf Hachaim 178:38 and Piskei Teshuvot 178:20 apply this to a snack just like a bread meal. The Taz 178:10 has an entirely different approach that rejects the Tosfot and Rosh and follows the opinion of Rabbenu Yom Tov that davening is a hefsek unless one left some of one's group at the first place.</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>
			# Eating one of the seven species of Israel is like bread, and therefore one who leaves the location and returns does not repeat the beracha. <ref> Yalkut Yosef, Siman 178 </ref>
	==Interruption of a Bread Meal==		==Interruption of a Bread Meal==

Unknown user: /* When is a new Bracha Rishona required? */

2022-07-05T21:03:42Z

When is a new Bracha Rishona required?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 5 July 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==When is a new Bracha Rishona required?==		==When is a new Bracha Rishona required?==
	# As long as one didn’t have a interruption in one's train of thought ([[Hesech Hadaat]]), which will be clarified below, one doesn’t need to make a new [[Bracha Rishona]]. However, if one made a [[Bracha Achrona]], and one wants to eat again a new [[Bracha Rishona]] is needed.<ref> Beiur Halacha 190 s.v. Acher, Vezot HaBracha (pg 53, chapter 5) </ref>
	# If one if planning on having coffee or tea for a length of time as one sits and learns, one [[Shehakol]] covers all the cups one drinks even there’s a long break between cups. <~~Ref~~> Sh”t Yechave Daat 6:11, Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:27, Sh”t Chazon Ovadyah 1:18, Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 224) </ref>		#As long as one didn’t have an interruption in one's train of thought ([[Hesech Hadaat]]), which will be clarified below, one doesn’t need to make a new [[Bracha Rishona]]. However, if one made a [[Bracha Achrona]], and one wants to eat again a new [[Bracha Rishona]] is needed.<ref>Beiur Halacha 190 s.v. Acher, Vezot HaBracha (pg 53, chapter 5) </ref>
	# If one made a [[Bracha Rishona]] and waited 72 minutes one doesn’t need to make another [[Bracha Rishona]]. <~~Ref~~>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3, pg 227) </ref>		#If one if planning on having coffee or tea for a length of time as one sits and learns, one [[Shehakol]] covers all the cups one drinks even there’s a long break between cups. <ref>Sh”t Yechave Daat 6:11, Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:27, Sh”t Chazon Ovadyah 1:18, Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 224) </ref>
	# If one made a [[Bracha Achrona]] only because one was afraid that Shuir Ikul would pass and one has intent to continue eating afterwards, one doesn’t need a new [[Bracha Rishona]] when one continues to eat. <~~Ref~~>Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 178:18) </ref>		#If one made a [[Bracha Rishona]] and waited 72 minutes one doesn’t need to make another [[Bracha Rishona]]. <ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3, pg 227) </ref>
	# One who went to the bathroom in the middle of a snack need not recite a new bracha upon returning. <~~Ref~~> Rama O.C. 178:7. Even though the Biur Halacha 178:7 writes that for a non-bread meal going to the bathroom would be an interruption, the Piskei Teshuvot 178:7 holds that nowadays when we have bathrooms indoors we don't recite a new bracha after going to the bathroom. Regarding Sephardim, even though Rav Ovadia Yosef (Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) and codified in Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330)) held that one should recite a bracha if one goes to the bathroom in the middle of a meal, later he retracted as is recorded in Yalkut Yosef (Brachot 5771 version, 178:26). Halacha Brurah 178:23 agrees.</ref>		#If one made a [[Bracha Achrona]] only because one was afraid that Shuir Ikul would pass and one has intent to continue eating afterwards, one doesn’t need a new [[Bracha Rishona]] when one continues to eat. <ref>Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 178:18) </ref>
	# If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>		#One who went to the bathroom in the middle of a snack need not recite a new bracha upon returning. <ref>Rama O.C. 178:7. Even though the Biur Halacha 178:7 writes that for a non-bread meal going to the bathroom would be an interruption, the Piskei Teshuvot 178:7 holds that nowadays when we have bathrooms indoors we don't recite a new bracha after going to the bathroom. Regarding Sephardim, even though Rav Ovadia Yosef (Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) and codified in Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330)) held that one should recite a bracha if one goes to the bathroom in the middle of a meal, later he retracted as is recorded in Yalkut Yosef (Brachot 5771 version, 178:26). Halacha Brurah 178:23 agrees.</ref>
	# If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vikru, Rosh Pesachim 10:24, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7 establish that davening isn't a hefsek to a meal. Kaf Hachaim 178:38 and Piskei Teshuvot 178:20 apply this to a snack just like a bread meal. The Taz 178:10 has an entirely different approach that rejects the Tosfot and Rosh and follows the opinion of Rabbenu Yom Tov that davening is a hefsek unless one left some of one's group at the first place.</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>		#If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>
			#If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vikru, Rosh Pesachim 10:24, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7 establish that davening isn't a hefsek to a meal. Kaf Hachaim 178:38 and Piskei Teshuvot 178:20 apply this to a snack just like a bread meal. The Taz 178:10 has an entirely different approach that rejects the Tosfot and Rosh and follows the opinion of Rabbenu Yom Tov that davening is a hefsek unless one left some of one's group at the first place.</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>

	==Interruption of a Bread Meal==		==Interruption of a Bread Meal==
	# If one Davened in middle of a meal it’s not considered an interruption.<~~Ref~~>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vaakru proves from the gemara that if a party left the house to daven it isn't considered an interruption of a meal that davening in the middle of a meal isn't considered an interruption at all. Even though one can't eat while one is davening, nonetheless, it isn't an interruption. Rosh Pesachim 10:24, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7, and Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 228) codify this. Shaar Hatziyun 178:42 accepts Shulchan Aruch and rejects the approach of Taz 178:10 who partially is interested in rejecting the Tosfot based on Rif Pesachim 24a.</ref>
	# Sleeping in middle of a meal isn’t considered an interruption except that one needs to wash [[Netilat Yadayim]]. <~~Ref~~>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 229) </ref>		#If one Davened in middle of a meal it’s not considered an interruption.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vaakru proves from the gemara that if a party left the house to daven it isn't considered an interruption of a meal that davening in the middle of a meal isn't considered an interruption at all. Even though one can't eat while one is davening, nonetheless, it isn't an interruption. Rosh Pesachim 10:24, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7, and Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 228) codify this. Shaar Hatziyun 178:42 accepts Shulchan Aruch and rejects the approach of Taz 178:10 who partially is interested in rejecting the Tosfot based on Rif Pesachim 24a.</ref>
	# During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <~~Ref~~> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref>		#Sleeping in middle of a meal isn’t considered an interruption except that one needs to wash [[Netilat Yadayim]]. <ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 229) </ref>
	# Someone who went to the bathroom during a meal isn’t considered an interruption rather one should just make [[Netilat Yadayim]] and [[Asher Yatzer]] afterwards. <~~Ref~~>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330) </ref>		#During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref>
	# If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal.<~~Ref~~>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref>		#Someone who went to the bathroom during a meal isn’t considered an interruption rather one should just make [[Netilat Yadayim]] and [[Asher Yatzer]] afterwards. <ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330) </ref>
	# Washing [[Mayim Achronim]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to eat afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona and wash Mayim Achronim again. Ideally a person should not interrupt between the first Mayim Achronim and the Birkat Hamazon.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1, Magen Avraham 179:2, Taz 179:1, Mishna Brurah 179:2</ref>		#If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal.<ref>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref>
	# Reciting the [[Zimmun]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to drink afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona. Some say that food and drinks are the same for this halacha, while others say that food would not require a new bracha rishona after zimmun even though drinks would.<~~Ref~~>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1</ref>		#Washing [[Mayim Achronim]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to eat afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona and wash Mayim Achronim again. Ideally a person should not interrupt between the first Mayim Achronim and the Birkat Hamazon.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1, Magen Avraham 179:2, Taz 179:1, Mishna Brurah 179:2</ref>
			#Reciting the [[Zimmun]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to drink afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona. Some say that food and drinks are the same for this halacha, while others say that food would not require a new bracha rishona after zimmun even though drinks would.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1</ref>

	==Mistaken Interruptions==		==Mistaken Interruptions==
	# If a person thought that he finished eating because he didn't see that he had more of that type of food and then found more of that food there is a dispute whether or not a person is required to recite a new bracha rishona.<ref>Rav Poalim OC 2:34 based on Tevuot Shor 19:32 who thinks it isn't a hefsek and Mizbe'ach Adama 1d who thinks it is a hefsek.</ref>
			#If a person thought that he finished eating because he didn't see that he had more of that type of food and then found more of that food there is a dispute whether or not a person is required to recite a new bracha rishona.<ref>Rav Poalim OC 2:34 based on Tevuot Shor 19:32 who thinks it isn't a hefsek and Mizbe'ach Adama 1d who thinks it is a hefsek.</ref>

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references />
	[[Category:Brachot]]		[[Category:Brachot]]

Unknown user: /* Interruption of a Bread Meal */

2020-10-07T03:20:37Z

Interruption of a Bread Meal

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 7 October 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:
	# Washing [[Mayim Achronim]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to eat afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona and wash Mayim Achronim again. Ideally a person should not interrupt between the first Mayim Achronim and the Birkat Hamazon.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1, Magen Avraham 179:2, Taz 179:1, Mishna Brurah 179:2</ref>		# Washing [[Mayim Achronim]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to eat afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona and wash Mayim Achronim again. Ideally a person should not interrupt between the first Mayim Achronim and the Birkat Hamazon.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1, Magen Avraham 179:2, Taz 179:1, Mishna Brurah 179:2</ref>
	# Reciting the [[Zimmun]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to drink afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona. Some say that food and drinks are the same for this halacha, while others say that food would not require a new bracha rishona after zimmun even though drinks would.<Ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1</ref>		# Reciting the [[Zimmun]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to drink afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona. Some say that food and drinks are the same for this halacha, while others say that food would not require a new bracha rishona after zimmun even though drinks would.<Ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1</ref>
			==Mistaken Interruptions==
			# If a person thought that he finished eating because he didn't see that he had more of that type of food and then found more of that food there is a dispute whether or not a person is required to recite a new bracha rishona.<ref>Rav Poalim OC 2:34 based on Tevuot Shor 19:32 who thinks it isn't a hefsek and Mizbe'ach Adama 1d who thinks it is a hefsek.</ref>

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>
	[[Category:Brachot]]		[[Category:Brachot]]

Unknown user: /* Interruption of a Bread Meal */

2020-10-07T03:17:15Z

Interruption of a Bread Meal

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 7 October 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:
	# If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal.<Ref>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref>		# If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal.<Ref>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref>
	# Washing [[Mayim Achronim]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to eat afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona and wash Mayim Achronim again. Ideally a person should not interrupt between the first Mayim Achronim and the Birkat Hamazon.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1, Magen Avraham 179:2, Taz 179:1, Mishna Brurah 179:2</ref>		# Washing [[Mayim Achronim]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to eat afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona and wash Mayim Achronim again. Ideally a person should not interrupt between the first Mayim Achronim and the Birkat Hamazon.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1, Magen Avraham 179:2, Taz 179:1, Mishna Brurah 179:2</ref>
	# Reciting the Zimmun is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to drink afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona. Some say that food and drinks are the same for this halacha, while others say that food would not require a new bracha rishona after zimmun even though drinks would.<Ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1</ref>		# Reciting the [[Zimmun]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to drink afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona. Some say that food and drinks are the same for this halacha, while others say that food would not require a new bracha rishona after zimmun even though drinks would.<Ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1</ref>

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>
	[[Category:Brachot]]		[[Category:Brachot]]

Unknown user: /* Interruption of a Bread Meal */

2020-10-07T03:16:50Z

Interruption of a Bread Meal

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 7 October 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	# During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref>		# During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref>
	# Someone who went to the bathroom during a meal isn’t considered an interruption rather one should just make [[Netilat Yadayim]] and [[Asher Yatzer]] afterwards. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330) </ref>		# Someone who went to the bathroom during a meal isn’t considered an interruption rather one should just make [[Netilat Yadayim]] and [[Asher Yatzer]] afterwards. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330) </ref>
	# If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal. <Ref>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref>		# If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal.<Ref>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref>
			# Washing [[Mayim Achronim]] is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to eat afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona and wash Mayim Achronim again. Ideally a person should not interrupt between the first Mayim Achronim and the Birkat Hamazon.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1, Magen Avraham 179:2, Taz 179:1, Mishna Brurah 179:2</ref>
			# Reciting the Zimmun is considered an interruption of the meal and if one wants to drink afterwards one should recite a new bracha rishona. Some say that food and drinks are the same for this halacha, while others say that food would not require a new bracha rishona after zimmun even though drinks would.<Ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 179:1</ref>

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>
	[[Category:Brachot]]		[[Category:Brachot]]

Unknown user: /* Interruption of a Bread Meal */

2020-09-01T00:44:09Z

Interruption of a Bread Meal

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:44, 1 September 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==Interruption of a Bread Meal==		==Interruption of a Bread Meal==
	# If one Davened in middle of a meal it’s not considered an interruption. <Ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vaakru proves from the gemara that if a party left the house to daven it isn't considered an interruption of a meal that davening in the middle of a meal isn't considered an interruption at all. Even though one can't eat while one is davening, nonetheless, it isn't an interruption. Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 228) ~~codifies~~ this.</ref>		# If one Davened in middle of a meal it’s not considered an interruption.<Ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vaakru proves from the gemara that if a party left the house to daven it isn't considered an interruption of a meal that davening in the middle of a meal isn't considered an interruption at all. Even though one can't eat while one is davening, nonetheless, it isn't an interruption. Rosh Pesachim 10:24, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7, and Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 228) codify this. Shaar Hatziyun 178:42 accepts Shulchan Aruch and rejects the approach of Taz 178:10 who partially is interested in rejecting the Tosfot based on Rif Pesachim 24a.</ref>
	# Sleeping in middle of a meal isn’t considered an interruption except that one needs to wash [[Netilat Yadayim]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 229) </ref>		# Sleeping in middle of a meal isn’t considered an interruption except that one needs to wash [[Netilat Yadayim]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 229) </ref>
	# During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref>		# During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref>

Unknown user: /* When is a new Bracha Rishona required? */

2020-09-01T00:42:07Z

When is a new Bracha Rishona required?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 1 September 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	# If one made a [[Bracha Rishona]] and waited 72 minutes one doesn’t need to make another [[Bracha Rishona]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3, pg 227) </ref>		# If one made a [[Bracha Rishona]] and waited 72 minutes one doesn’t need to make another [[Bracha Rishona]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3, pg 227) </ref>
	# If one made a [[Bracha Achrona]] only because one was afraid that Shuir Ikul would pass and one has intent to continue eating afterwards, one doesn’t need a new [[Bracha Rishona]] when one continues to eat. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 178:18) </ref>		# If one made a [[Bracha Achrona]] only because one was afraid that Shuir Ikul would pass and one has intent to continue eating afterwards, one doesn’t need a new [[Bracha Rishona]] when one continues to eat. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 178:18) </ref>
	# One who went to the bathroom in the middle of a snack need not recite a new bracha upon returning. <Ref> Rama OC 178:7. Even though the Biur Halacha 178:7 writes that for a non-bread meal going to the bathroom would be an interruption, the Piskei Teshuvot 178:7 holds that nowadays when we have bathrooms indoors we don't recite a new bracha after going to the bathroom. Regarding Sephardim, even though Rav Ovadia Yosef (Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) and codified in Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330)) held that one should recite a bracha if one goes to the bathroom in the middle of a meal, later he retracted as is recorded in Yalkut Yosef (Brachot 5771 version, 178:26). Halacha Brurah 178:23 agrees.</ref>		# One who went to the bathroom in the middle of a snack need not recite a new bracha upon returning. <Ref> Rama O.C. 178:7. Even though the Biur Halacha 178:7 writes that for a non-bread meal going to the bathroom would be an interruption, the Piskei Teshuvot 178:7 holds that nowadays when we have bathrooms indoors we don't recite a new bracha after going to the bathroom. Regarding Sephardim, even though Rav Ovadia Yosef (Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) and codified in Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330)) held that one should recite a bracha if one goes to the bathroom in the middle of a meal, later he retracted as is recorded in Yalkut Yosef (Brachot 5771 version, 178:26). Halacha Brurah 178:23 agrees.</ref>
	# If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>		# If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>
	# If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Kaf Hachaim 178:38, Piskei Teshuvot 178:20</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>		# If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vikru, Rosh Pesachim 10:24, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 178:7 establish that davening isn't a hefsek to a meal. Kaf Hachaim 178:38 and Piskei Teshuvot 178:20 apply this to a snack just like a bread meal. The Taz 178:10 has an entirely different approach that rejects the Tosfot and Rosh and follows the opinion of Rabbenu Yom Tov that davening is a hefsek unless one left some of one's group at the first place.</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>

	==Interruption of a Bread Meal==		==Interruption of a Bread Meal==

Unknown user: Text replacement - ". " to "."

2020-07-11T11:04:11Z

Text replacement - ". <ref>" to ".<ref>"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 11 July 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==When is a new Bracha Rishona required?==		==When is a new Bracha Rishona required?==
	# As long as one didn’t have a interruption in one's train of thought ([[Hesech Hadaat]]), which will be clarified below, one doesn’t need to make a new [[Bracha Rishona]]. However, if one made a [[Bracha Achrona]], and one wants to eat again a new [[Bracha Rishona]] is needed. <ref> Beiur Halacha 190 s.v. Acher, Vezot HaBracha (pg 53, chapter 5) </ref>		# As long as one didn’t have a interruption in one's train of thought ([[Hesech Hadaat]]), which will be clarified below, one doesn’t need to make a new [[Bracha Rishona]]. However, if one made a [[Bracha Achrona]], and one wants to eat again a new [[Bracha Rishona]] is needed.<ref> Beiur Halacha 190 s.v. Acher, Vezot HaBracha (pg 53, chapter 5) </ref>
	# If one if planning on having coffee or tea for a length of time as one sits and learns, one [[Shehakol]] covers all the cups one drinks even there’s a long break between cups. <Ref> Sh”t Yechave Daat 6:11, Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:27, Sh”t Chazon Ovadyah 1:18, Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 224) </ref>		# If one if planning on having coffee or tea for a length of time as one sits and learns, one [[Shehakol]] covers all the cups one drinks even there’s a long break between cups. <Ref> Sh”t Yechave Daat 6:11, Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:27, Sh”t Chazon Ovadyah 1:18, Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 224) </ref>
	# If one made a [[Bracha Rishona]] and waited 72 minutes one doesn’t need to make another [[Bracha Rishona]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3, pg 227) </ref>		# If one made a [[Bracha Rishona]] and waited 72 minutes one doesn’t need to make another [[Bracha Rishona]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3, pg 227) </ref>

YitzchakSultan: /* When is a new Bracha Rishona required? */

2019-09-18T18:24:59Z

When is a new Bracha Rishona required?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 18 September 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	# One who went to the bathroom in the middle of a snack need not recite a new bracha upon returning. <Ref> Rama OC 178:7. Even though the Biur Halacha 178:7 writes that for a non-bread meal going to the bathroom would be an interruption, the Piskei Teshuvot 178:7 holds that nowadays when we have bathrooms indoors we don't recite a new bracha after going to the bathroom. Regarding Sephardim, even though Rav Ovadia Yosef (Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) and codified in Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330)) held that one should recite a bracha if one goes to the bathroom in the middle of a meal, later he retracted as is recorded in Yalkut Yosef (Brachot 5771 version, 178:26). Halacha Brurah 178:23 agrees.</ref>		# One who went to the bathroom in the middle of a snack need not recite a new bracha upon returning. <Ref> Rama OC 178:7. Even though the Biur Halacha 178:7 writes that for a non-bread meal going to the bathroom would be an interruption, the Piskei Teshuvot 178:7 holds that nowadays when we have bathrooms indoors we don't recite a new bracha after going to the bathroom. Regarding Sephardim, even though Rav Ovadia Yosef (Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) and codified in Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330)) held that one should recite a bracha if one goes to the bathroom in the middle of a meal, later he retracted as is recorded in Yalkut Yosef (Brachot 5771 version, 178:26). Halacha Brurah 178:23 agrees.</ref>
	# If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>		# If someone fell asleep in a temporary fashion it isn't considered an interruption for a bracha. If one went to sleep on one's bed it is considered an interruption.<ref>Shulchan Aruch OC 178:7 from Rosh Tanit, Halachos of Brachos p. 130</ref> Falling asleep in one's chair is generally considered a temporary sleep and isn't considered an interruption.<ref>Dirshu 178:37 citing Rav Sheinberg (Chidushei Batra)</ref>
			# If one davened in the middle of a snack the davening isn't considered an interruption to the bracha rishona.<ref>Kaf Hachaim 178:38, Piskei Teshuvot 178:20</ref> Some disagree.<ref>Aruch Hashulchan 178:15 writes that davening isn't considered an interruption for a bread meal but for other foods it is an interruption.</ref>

	==Interruption of a Bread Meal==		==Interruption of a Bread Meal==