Bosis - Revision history

YitzchakSultan1 at 17:36, 13 July 2023

2023-07-13T17:36:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:36, 13 July 2023
Line 86:		Line 86:
	[[Category:Shabbat]]		[[Category:Shabbat]]
	[[Category:Muktzeh]]		[[Category:Muktzeh]]
			{{Shabbat Table}}

Unknown user: /* Drawers */

2023-03-30T06:32:21Z

Drawers

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:32, 30 March 2023
Line 37:		Line 37:
	===Drawers===		===Drawers===
	# If someone leaves items in a drawer with a muktzeh item on top of a permitted item, some say that the permitted item on bottom isn't muktzeh, while some disagree.<ref>Trumat Hadeshen Pesakim 193 writes that some wanted to permit something that was left haphazardly on top of something else unless it was left there to rest there securely. He disagrees with that position. Magen Avraham 309:6 accepts the lenient view. Rabbi Akiva Eiger 309:4 rejects one of the proofs of the Magen Avraham.</ref> Ashkenazim can be lenient in a case of need,<ref>Mishna Brurah 309:18, Shulchan Aruch Harav 309:9, Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 134</ref> Sephardim should be strict.<ref>Taz 309:1, Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 133</ref>		# If someone leaves items in a drawer with a muktzeh item on top of a permitted item, some say that the permitted item on bottom isn't muktzeh, while some disagree.<ref>Trumat Hadeshen Pesakim 193 writes that some wanted to permit something that was left haphazardly on top of something else unless it was left there to rest there securely. He disagrees with that position. Magen Avraham 309:6 accepts the lenient view. Rabbi Akiva Eiger 309:4 rejects one of the proofs of the Magen Avraham.</ref> Ashkenazim can be lenient in a case of need,<ref>Mishna Brurah 309:18, Shulchan Aruch Harav 309:9, Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 134</ref> Sephardim should be strict.<ref>Taz 309:1, Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 133</ref>
			# If the non-muktzeh items in a drawer are just as valuable as the muktzeh items next to them then opening the drawer is permissible. <ref> Hazon Ovadia, Volume 3, Page 130 </ref>
	# Regarding muktzeh food on top of non-muktzeh food in a freezer drawer, some say that food isn't a bosis.<Ref>Meiri 141b, Ritva 142a, Kol Bo 31 write that food isn't a bosis. Rama 311:8 cites the Kol Bo. Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 132 seems to support this approach. The Magen Avraham 311:23 and Gra 311:26 explain that it isn't normal for a food to service muktzeh and serve as a holder of muktzeh. However, Or Same'ach 25:15 explains that food which is usable is never a bosis since I don't intend to put it aside. Taz 311:10 disregards this entire approach. </ref>		# Regarding muktzeh food on top of non-muktzeh food in a freezer drawer, some say that food isn't a bosis.<Ref>Meiri 141b, Ritva 142a, Kol Bo 31 write that food isn't a bosis. Rama 311:8 cites the Kol Bo. Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 132 seems to support this approach. The Magen Avraham 311:23 and Gra 311:26 explain that it isn't normal for a food to service muktzeh and serve as a holder of muktzeh. However, Or Same'ach 25:15 explains that food which is usable is never a bosis since I don't intend to put it aside. Taz 311:10 disregards this entire approach. </ref>
	# If you have muktzeh on the table the drawers do not become a bosis.<ref>If the drawers are removable certainly they aren’t a bosis (Birkat Reuven Muktzeh p. 75) since they aren’t a unit with the table (Mishna Brurah 310:31). However, with respect to drawers that aren’t removable, Kesot Hashulchan (Badei Hashulchan 112:20) has a safek about whether you can open the drawer of a table that is a bosis to muktzeh. Machon Lshivtecha 308:8 p. 209 is lenient for the drawers. Birkat Reuven pp. 75-6 writes that he saw the Tehilah Ldovid 310:7 who is lenient and compares it to the Pri Megadim M"Z 310:1 that a tablecloth can be partially a bosis, however, the Levushei Sarad disagrees. Birkat Reuven leaves it unresolved.</ref>		# If you have muktzeh on the table the drawers do not become a bosis.<ref>If the drawers are removable certainly they aren’t a bosis (Birkat Reuven Muktzeh p. 75) since they aren’t a unit with the table (Mishna Brurah 310:31). However, with respect to drawers that aren’t removable, Kesot Hashulchan (Badei Hashulchan 112:20) has a safek about whether you can open the drawer of a table that is a bosis to muktzeh. Machon Lshivtecha 308:8 p. 209 is lenient for the drawers. Birkat Reuven pp. 75-6 writes that he saw the Tehilah Ldovid 310:7 who is lenient and compares it to the Pri Megadim M"Z 310:1 that a tablecloth can be partially a bosis, however, the Levushei Sarad disagrees. Birkat Reuven leaves it unresolved.</ref>

Unknown user: /* Garbage Drawer */

2021-07-23T04:47:44Z

Garbage Drawer

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 23 July 2021
Line 56:		Line 56:
	===Garbage Drawer===		===Garbage Drawer===
	# A garbage drawer in a kitchen cabinet is considered a bosis for muktzeh and may not be opened on Shabbat even though it is a drawer that's part of a larger cabinet because it is meant to open and close and hold the garbage.<ref>Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 155 19:299</ref>		# A garbage drawer in a kitchen cabinet is considered a bosis for muktzeh and may not be opened on Shabbat even though it is a drawer that's part of a larger cabinet because it is meant to open and close and hold the garbage.<ref>Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 155 19:299</ref>
	# A garbage bag hanging on the inside of a cabinet door, such as hanging on the inside of the door for a cabinet beneath the sink, there is a discussion of whether it is considered a bosis.<ref>Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 154 19:298</ref> ~~A person should ask their local rabbi~~.		# A garbage bag hanging on the inside of a cabinet door, such as hanging on the inside of the door for a cabinet beneath the sink, there is a discussion of whether it is considered a bosis.<ref>Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 154 19:298</ref> Some are lenient if the cabinet is used for other purposes as well, but if it is designated for the garbage it is forbidden.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 20:77</ref>

	==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==		==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==

Unknown user: /* Sefarim */

2021-07-23T04:09:02Z

Sefarim

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 23 July 2021
Line 54:		Line 54:
	===Sefarim===		===Sefarim===
	# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref>		# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref>
			===Garbage Drawer===
			# A garbage drawer in a kitchen cabinet is considered a bosis for muktzeh and may not be opened on Shabbat even though it is a drawer that's part of a larger cabinet because it is meant to open and close and hold the garbage.<ref>Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 155 19:299</ref>
			# A garbage bag hanging on the inside of a cabinet door, such as hanging on the inside of the door for a cabinet beneath the sink, there is a discussion of whether it is considered a bosis.<ref>Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 154 19:298</ref> A person should ask their local rabbi.

	==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==		==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==

Unknown user: /* Key Chain */

2021-05-26T19:53:39Z

Key Chain

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 26 May 2021
Line 49:		Line 49:

	===Key Chain===		===Key Chain===
	# A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted.</ref>		# A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted. He also supports this with the Yeshuot Yakov 308:5 who holds that there's no bosis for a kli shemelachto lisur.</ref>
	# Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref>		# Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8. Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 135 cites Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 20:86 and Bear Moshe 8:185 as advising separating the muktzeh keys before Shabbat, however he says that Minchat Yitzchak 8:22 implies that it isn't necessary.</ref>

	===Sefarim===		===Sefarim===
	# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref>		# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref>

Unknown user: Text replacement - ". " to "."

2020-07-14T18:32:12Z

Text replacement - ". <ref>" to ".<ref>"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 14 July 2020
Line 72:		Line 72:

	==A Bosis with both Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==		==A Bosis with both Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==
	# A vessel which has on it both a [[muktzeh]] item and a non-[[muktzeh]] item is non-[[muktzeh]] if the non-[[muktzeh]] item is more impotant than the [[muktzeh]] item, however, if the [[muktzeh]] item is more important, then the vessel is [[muktzeh]]. <ref> The Shulchan Aruch 310:8 writes that an object which has on it both a mutkzah item and a non-[[Muktzeh]] item is permissible to move if the non-[[Muktzeh]] item is more important (חשוב). </ref> If they are both equal some poskim hold that it isn't a bosis.<ref>Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 131 writes that the Chaye Adam 67:8 holds it is forbidden if both are of equal importance against the Aruch Hashulchan 310:15 who is lenient. He sides with those who are lenient because of the Ran Shabbat 47a and Hagahot Maimoniyot 26:7 who imply it is permitted.</ref>		# A vessel which has on it both a [[muktzeh]] item and a non-[[muktzeh]] item is non-[[muktzeh]] if the non-[[muktzeh]] item is more impotant than the [[muktzeh]] item, however, if the [[muktzeh]] item is more important, then the vessel is [[muktzeh]].<ref> The Shulchan Aruch 310:8 writes that an object which has on it both a mutkzah item and a non-[[Muktzeh]] item is permissible to move if the non-[[Muktzeh]] item is more important (חשוב). </ref> If they are both equal some poskim hold that it isn't a bosis.<ref>Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 131 writes that the Chaye Adam 67:8 holds it is forbidden if both are of equal importance against the Aruch Hashulchan 310:15 who is lenient. He sides with those who are lenient because of the Ran Shabbat 47a and Hagahot Maimoniyot 26:7 who imply it is permitted.</ref>
	# What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref>		# What is considered more important depends on the owner.<ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref>
	# Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-[[muktzah]] object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important. <ref>		# Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-[[muktzah]] object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important.<ref>
	Halachos of [[Muktzah]] (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of [[challah]] and money are on a vessel the [[challah]] is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. This is also the opinion of the Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:61 in name of Rav Shlomo Zalman that anything which is needed for that [[Shabbat]] such as [[challah]] or something else of value. [See also Chaye Adam ([[Shabbat]] 66:4) and Magen Avraham 279:5 who seem to hold of this.] </ref>		Halachos of [[Muktzah]] (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of [[challah]] and money are on a vessel the [[challah]] is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. This is also the opinion of the Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:61 in name of Rav Shlomo Zalman that anything which is needed for that [[Shabbat]] such as [[challah]] or something else of value. [See also Chaye Adam ([[Shabbat]] 66:4) and Magen Avraham 279:5 who seem to hold of this.] </ref>

Unknown user: Text replacement - "Shemirat Shabbat" to "Shemirat Shabbat"

2020-07-07T17:26:11Z

Text replacement - "Shemirat Shabbat" to "Shemirat Shabbat"

YitzchakSultan: /* Sefarim */

2019-11-26T19:10:30Z

Sefarim

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 26 November 2019
Line 51:		Line 51:
	# A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted.</ref>		# A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted.</ref>
	# Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref>		# Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref>
	==Sefarim==		===Sefarim===
	# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref>		# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref>

YitzchakSultan: /* Key Chain */

2019-11-26T19:10:18Z

Key Chain

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 26 November 2019
Line 51:		Line 51:
	# A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted.</ref>		# A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted.</ref>
	# Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref>		# Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref>
			==Sefarim==
			# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref>

	==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==		==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==

YitzchakSultan: /* Intention to Leave It */

2019-08-12T19:40:24Z

Intention to Leave It

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 12 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==What is a Bosis?==		==What is a Bosis?==
	===Intention to Leave It===		===Intention to Leave It===
	# An object upon which [[Muktzeh]] was left intentionally from before [[Shabbat]] and one intended that it stay there as [[Shabbat]] entered (during [[Bein HaShemashot]]), the object becomes a Bosis. <ref>Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 89:1</ref>		# An object upon which [[Muktzeh]] was left intentionally from before [[Shabbat]] and one intended that it stay there as [[Shabbat]] entered (during [[Bein HaShemashot]]), the object becomes a Bosis.<ref>Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 89:1. Mishna Brurah 309:18 writes that according to the Bet Yosef 309:4 an item isn't a bosis unless one had specific and direct intentions that it would hold a muktzeh item, however, if one didn't intend anything it wouldn't be a bosis unless that is the designated place. According to the Bet Yosef this is true all week, while according to the Trumat Hadeshen 2:193 if it is on Friday it is considered intentional.</ref>
	# If muktzeh was placed on an object for part of Shabbat but was going to be removed before the end of Shabbat that object is a bosis.<ref>Rashba Shabbat 51a s.v. ha, Rashi</ref> Some Ashkenazim hold that it isn't a bosis unless one intended to leave it there for all of Shabbat.<ref>Baal Hameor Shabbat 23b s.v. vha, Tosfot 51a s.v. oh, 123a s.v. paga, Tosfot Beitzah 2a s.v. ubet citing Rabbenu Tam.		# If muktzeh was placed on an object for part of Shabbat but was going to be removed before the end of Shabbat that object is a bosis.<ref>Rashba Shabbat 51a s.v. ha, Rashi</ref> Some Ashkenazim hold that it isn't a bosis unless one intended to leave it there for all of Shabbat.<ref>Baal Hameor Shabbat 23b s.v. vha, Tosfot 51a s.v. oh, 123a s.v. paga, Tosfot Beitzah 2a s.v. ubet citing Rabbenu Tam.
	* Rashba 51a asks how the Baal Hameor could say that it isn't a bosis if one intends to remove it on Shabbat since every candle is like that since it is going to go out. The Rashba beitzah 2a s.v. ubet answers for the Baal Hameor that since one couldn't extinguish it during Ben Hashemashot it is a bosis even if one knew it wouldn't be a bosis for all of Shabbat. Alternatively, a candle is muktzeh machmat isur and not a bosis. See Shaarei Muktzeh p. 291 for explaining the Rashba.</ref>		* Rashba 51a asks how the Baal Hameor could say that it isn't a bosis if one intends to remove it on Shabbat since every candle is like that since it is going to go out. The Rashba beitzah 2a s.v. ubet answers for the Baal Hameor that since one couldn't extinguish it during Ben Hashemashot it is a bosis even if one knew it wouldn't be a bosis for all of Shabbat. Alternatively, a candle is muktzeh machmat isur and not a bosis. See Shaarei Muktzeh p. 291 for explaining the Rashba.</ref>

	===Unintentional===		===Unintentional===
	# If money or any other [[muktzeh]] item was left unintentionally on a table, one may learn on the table on [[Shabbat]] if it isn’t certain that learning there will cause the money to move. <Ref> The Mishnah ([[Shabbat]] 142b) states that if one wants to move a barrel on [[Shabbat]] and a rock was left on top of the barrel from before [[Shabbat]], he may tilt the barrel so that the rock falls off and then move the barrel. The Gemara limits this to a case in which the rock was left unintentionally; however, if the rock was left on top of the barrel intentionally, one may not move the barrel at all, as it is considered a bosis for [[muktzeh]], serving as a support of the [[muktzeh]] item. The Mishnah explains if one isn’t able to tilt off the rock, such as if there’s a fear of it breaking other barrels nearby when it is tilting off, one may move the barrel with the rock on top until one reaches a places where one can safely remove the rock. The Rambam ([[Shabbat]] 25:17), Tur, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 309:4 codify this as Halacha.		# If money or any other [[muktzeh]] item was left unintentionally on a table, one may learn on the table on [[Shabbat]] if it isn’t certain that learning there will cause the money to move. <Ref> The Mishnah ([[Shabbat]] 142b) states that if one wants to move a barrel on [[Shabbat]] and a rock was left on top of the barrel from before [[Shabbat]], he may tilt the barrel so that the rock falls off and then move the barrel. The Gemara limits this to a case in which the rock was left unintentionally; however, if the rock was left on top of the barrel intentionally, one may not move the barrel at all, as it is considered a bosis for [[muktzeh]], serving as a support of the [[muktzeh]] item. The Mishnah explains if one isn’t able to tilt off the rock, such as if there’s a fear of it breaking other barrels nearby when it is tilting off, one may move the barrel with the rock on top until one reaches a places where one can safely remove the rock. The Rambam ([[Shabbat]] 25:17), Tur, and Shulchan Aruch O.C. 309:4 codify this as Halacha.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 7 July 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	# If one realizes that he left money in his pocket on [[Shabbat]], one may shake out the money and then wear the clothing. However, if one already is wearing the clothing, he may continue wearing it until he reaches a place where he can shake out the money. <Ref> The Beit Yosef 309:5 writes that if one forgets money in a pocket which is sewn onto the clothing at the top of the pocket and not along its entire side, the clothing does not become a bosis, as the money isn’t on top of the primary part of the clothing. Nonetheless, adds the Beit Yosef, it is forbidden to wear the clothing because of a prohibition that one may carry it on [[Shabbat]]. Rama 310:8 agrees.		# If one realizes that he left money in his pocket on [[Shabbat]], one may shake out the money and then wear the clothing. However, if one already is wearing the clothing, he may continue wearing it until he reaches a place where he can shake out the money. <Ref> The Beit Yosef 309:5 writes that if one forgets money in a pocket which is sewn onto the clothing at the top of the pocket and not along its entire side, the clothing does not become a bosis, as the money isn’t on top of the primary part of the clothing. Nonetheless, adds the Beit Yosef, it is forbidden to wear the clothing because of a prohibition that one may carry it on [[Shabbat]]. Rama 310:8 agrees.
	* Magen Avraham 310:7 elaborates that regarding a pocket which is sewn only at its top to the clothing, one does not even have to shake out the money before moving it, since it was left there unintentionally and the money is not on the primary part of the clothing. If the pocket was sewn along the entire length onto the clothing, however, the money would need to be shaken out. Mishna Brurah 310:29 writes that if the money was left there intentionally, one shouldn’t put his hands in the pocket because the pocket itself certainly is a bosis. Rabbi Yisrael Bodner (Tiltulei [[Shabbat]] p. 94) writes that the common pants pockets are sewn only at the top of the pocket, whereas shirt pockets are sewn along their entire length. He notes that in either case, if one wants to wear the clothing he must shake out the money.		* Magen Avraham 310:7 elaborates that regarding a pocket which is sewn only at its top to the clothing, one does not even have to shake out the money before moving it, since it was left there unintentionally and the money is not on the primary part of the clothing. If the pocket was sewn along the entire length onto the clothing, however, the money would need to be shaken out. Mishna Brurah 310:29 writes that if the money was left there intentionally, one shouldn’t put his hands in the pocket because the pocket itself certainly is a bosis. Rabbi Yisrael Bodner (Tiltulei [[Shabbat]] p. 94) writes that the common pants pockets are sewn only at the top of the pocket, whereas shirt pockets are sewn along their entire length. He notes that in either case, if one wants to wear the clothing he must shake out the money.
	* Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHilchata 20:75 writes that if one realizes that one forgot money in his pocket only after he already is wearing the clothing and would be embarrassed to remove the clothing in order to shake out the [[muktzeh]], he may continue to wear the clothing until he reaches a place where he can shake out the [[muktzeh]].		* Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:75 writes that if one realizes that one forgot money in his pocket only after he already is wearing the clothing and would be embarrassed to remove the clothing in order to shake out the [[muktzeh]], he may continue to wear the clothing until he reaches a place where he can shake out the [[muktzeh]].
	* The Chayei Adam 67:10 writes that if only a few insignificant coins were left in the pocket, they are nullified to the clothing because a person wouldn’t nullify the use of his clothing because of a few coins. Mishna Brurah 310:31 agrees. </ref>		* The Chayei Adam 67:10 writes that if only a few insignificant coins were left in the pocket, they are nullified to the clothing because a person wouldn’t nullify the use of his clothing because of a few coins. Mishna Brurah 310:31 agrees. </ref>

Line 29:		Line 29:
	===Freezer Door===		===Freezer Door===
	# If raw meat or another [[muktzeh]] item was left on the door of one’s freezer, the door does not become a bosis. <Ref> The Gemara ([[Shabbat]] 120b) records the opinion of Rav, who forbade opening or closing a door with an oil candle built in. Tosfot (s.v. Pote’ach) explain that when the door is moved, the oil in the candle is distanced or brought closer to the wick, thereby violating Mechabeh or Mav’ir. Tosfot ask why the Gemara didn’t forbid it because the door is bosis. Their first answer is that the door can’t become a bosis, as it is nullified to the house and not to the candle. Mordechai (Siman 400) agrees.		# If raw meat or another [[muktzeh]] item was left on the door of one’s freezer, the door does not become a bosis. <Ref> The Gemara ([[Shabbat]] 120b) records the opinion of Rav, who forbade opening or closing a door with an oil candle built in. Tosfot (s.v. Pote’ach) explain that when the door is moved, the oil in the candle is distanced or brought closer to the wick, thereby violating Mechabeh or Mav’ir. Tosfot ask why the Gemara didn’t forbid it because the door is bosis. Their first answer is that the door can’t become a bosis, as it is nullified to the house and not to the candle. Mordechai (Siman 400) agrees.
	* Although the Bei’ur Halacha s.v. Af notes that the Yerushalmi considers the door a bosis unless the candle was left there unintentionally, he suggests that the Yerushalmi is in disagreement with the Bavli. Mishna Brurah 277:4 and Kaf HaChaim 227:11 quote the Mordechai as halacha. Thus, Shemirat [[Shabbat]] Kehilchata 20:77 writes that if [[muktzeh]] is left hanging on a house or cabinet door, the door does not become a bosis. Rabbi Hershel Schachter (Halachipedia Article 5773 #22) said that the same would apply to frozen raw meat or other [[muktzeh]] items on the door of his freezer, and the door does not become a bosis.</ref>		* Although the Bei’ur Halacha s.v. Af notes that the Yerushalmi considers the door a bosis unless the candle was left there unintentionally, he suggests that the Yerushalmi is in disagreement with the Bavli. Mishna Brurah 277:4 and Kaf HaChaim 227:11 quote the Mordechai as halacha. Thus, Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 20:77 writes that if [[muktzeh]] is left hanging on a house or cabinet door, the door does not become a bosis. Rabbi Hershel Schachter (Halachipedia Article 5773 #22) said that the same would apply to frozen raw meat or other [[muktzeh]] items on the door of his freezer, and the door does not become a bosis.</ref>
	## You should remove all muktzeh from the freezer door before Shabbat.<ref>Birurei Chaim v. 5 p. 562 citing Rav Elyashiv (Shvut Yitzchak Muktzeh p. 150)</ref> Others disagree.<ref>Dirshu 308:9</ref>		## You should remove all muktzeh from the freezer door before Shabbat.<ref>Birurei Chaim v. 5 p. 562 citing Rav Elyashiv (Shvut Yitzchak Muktzeh p. 150)</ref> Others disagree.<ref>Dirshu 308:9</ref>

	===Baskets and Purses===		===Baskets and Purses===
	# A basket of fruit with a rock in it shouldn’t be moved without shaking out the rock or at least spilling out everything and returning the fruit without the rock. However, if spilling/shaking out the basket will ruin the fruit one may move the basket as a whole. <Ref>Shulchan Aruch 309:3, Mishna Brurah 309:10 </ref>		# A basket of fruit with a rock in it shouldn’t be moved without shaking out the rock or at least spilling out everything and returning the fruit without the rock. However, if spilling/shaking out the basket will ruin the fruit one may move the basket as a whole. <Ref>Shulchan Aruch 309:3, Mishna Brurah 309:10 </ref>
	# A purse which is made to hold money if there’s no money inside is considered a [[Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur]] and so if there’s a key inside one may open it to take out the key. <Ref>Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHilchata 20:16 </ref>		# A purse which is made to hold money if there’s no money inside is considered a [[Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur]] and so if there’s a key inside one may open it to take out the key. <Ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:16 </ref>
	===Drawers===		===Drawers===
	# If someone leaves items in a drawer with a muktzeh item on top of a permitted item, some say that the permitted item on bottom isn't muktzeh, while some disagree.<ref>Trumat Hadeshen Pesakim 193 writes that some wanted to permit something that was left haphazardly on top of something else unless it was left there to rest there securely. He disagrees with that position. Magen Avraham 309:6 accepts the lenient view. Rabbi Akiva Eiger 309:4 rejects one of the proofs of the Magen Avraham.</ref> Ashkenazim can be lenient in a case of need,<ref>Mishna Brurah 309:18, Shulchan Aruch Harav 309:9, Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 134</ref> Sephardim should be strict.<ref>Taz 309:1, Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 133</ref>		# If someone leaves items in a drawer with a muktzeh item on top of a permitted item, some say that the permitted item on bottom isn't muktzeh, while some disagree.<ref>Trumat Hadeshen Pesakim 193 writes that some wanted to permit something that was left haphazardly on top of something else unless it was left there to rest there securely. He disagrees with that position. Magen Avraham 309:6 accepts the lenient view. Rabbi Akiva Eiger 309:4 rejects one of the proofs of the Magen Avraham.</ref> Ashkenazim can be lenient in a case of need,<ref>Mishna Brurah 309:18, Shulchan Aruch Harav 309:9, Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 134</ref> Sephardim should be strict.<ref>Taz 309:1, Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 133</ref>
Line 75:		Line 75:
	# What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref>		# What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref>
	# Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-[[muktzah]] object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important. <ref>		# Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-[[muktzah]] object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important. <ref>
	Halachos of [[Muktzah]] (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of [[challah]] and money are on a vessel the [[challah]] is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. This is also the opinion of the Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHilchata 20:61 in name of Rav Shlomo Zalman that anything which is needed for that [[Shabbat]] such as [[challah]] or something else of value. [See also Chaye Adam ([[Shabbat]] 66:4) and Magen Avraham 279:5 who seem to hold of this.] </ref>		Halachos of [[Muktzah]] (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of [[challah]] and money are on a vessel the [[challah]] is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. This is also the opinion of the Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:61 in name of Rav Shlomo Zalman that anything which is needed for that [[Shabbat]] such as [[challah]] or something else of value. [See also Chaye Adam ([[Shabbat]] 66:4) and Magen Avraham 279:5 who seem to hold of this.] </ref>

	==Sources==		==Sources==